(Amtrak's proposed new rail network) "We celebrated the infrastructure bill for about a day, and then I panicked," Jennie Louwerse, Pennsylvania's deputy secretary of multimodal transportation, said at a railway conference in March. "Just like the National Highway Act of 1956, this funding bill is transformational. But this is our one bite at this apple to prove we can do amazing things with this money." The Need for Speed: While the agency may be grateful for the funding, the money will fail to rectify what many consider to be the most significant problem with US rail: its decidedly lackluster speed. In fact, the federal infrastructure bill earmarked not a single dollar towards the development of high-speed rail. Today, America boasts just one passenger railway line capable of delivering high-speed travel, Amtrak's Acela, which spans 457 miles from Boston to D.C. The train only reaches high speed (typically starting at 155 miles per hour) for a single 33-mile stretch. Just How Bad is It? According to a study published last year commissioned by Greenpeace, one-third of Europe's 150 busiest short-haul flights (categorized as any trip between 30 minutes and 3 hours), has a rail-alternative route that can be completed in under six hours. For reference, the rail alternative to the 2-hour and 50-minute flight from Los Angeles to Seattle would take 35 hours on Amtrak's Coast Starlight route. High-profile, high-speed rail projects in the US have arguably been hurt by their well-earned reputation for going off the fiscal rails: - In 2008, California voted to spend $33 billion on a high-speed rail connection between San Francisco and Los Angeles that would take less than three hours (Amtrak currently takes twelve).
- The project's budget is now expected to balloon to over $100 billion. The opening date has been pushed back a decade to 2030, at which point only a 165-mile segment between Bakersfield and Merced will launch.
In Europe, by contrast, investments in high-speed and functional rail have paid off, creating a greener, cleaner, and even cheaper alternative to the budget airlines that have taken off on the Continent. In the meantime, a 2021 McKinsey report found that rail produces less carbon per kilometer ridden by an individual passenger than electric cars. Over the Hill? As Amtrak recovers from the scourge of 2020, also the year of its fiftieth birthday, it appears that there is an unbridgeable gap between what Europe, Japan, and China have done to bring rail transport into the futuristic present, and what America seems willing to do for its quasi-public passenger transport network. With gas prices where they are, one can only hope we get our act together ***** Is This Stock a Millionaire Maker? It's a big claim. But it's one Motley Fool analysts are standing behind. In the entire 20-year history of Motley Fool Stock Advisor, only 31 stocks have earned a "triple down buy alert." The track record of stocks earning this designation is….elite: - Netflix (recommended 12/17/2004) up 10,532%
- Amazon (recommended 9/6/2002) up 16,202%
- Nvidia (recommended 4/15/2005) up 11,396%
- Booking Holdings (formerly Priceline, recommended 5/21/2004) 9,800%
- Shopify up 1,016% since just 7/15/2016!
Motley Fool is releasing their latest "triple down" pick exclusively to members of Stock Advisor. Sign up today and receive access to this millionaire maker. Returns as of 6/7/2022 |
0 Comments:
Post a Comment